are the best! The way that they can paint a picture of a situation and try to sway a jury. The way that they pick their sentences to ask the right questions. It's just amazing. I never had jury duty before, as a single parent, never had to serve. Luckily, I can now, and I mean luckily, it's so interesting!First let's talk about the Judge. Besides the fact that he is very handsome, he had charisma to the hilt. He never talked down to anyone, he assumed that everyone in the room was intelligent, had common sense and would uphold the law, keep an open mind and deliberate respectfully. He was very nice and even made a few jokes along the way. He clearly explained the why, how, etc. of the responsibility of the jury. He also made sure that everyone understood that if you were not selected it meant only that this was not the correct case for you and it didn't mean that you were not a good person or could be a good juror in another case. Did I mention how handsome he was? ;-)
As I observed the two lawyers and their styles I noted differences in their manners, body language and speech. The first lawyer made his opening statement and he was self assured, calm, matter of fact and looked each and every juror in the eye. He had command of the jury. The second lawyer made his opening speech and he made it a point to give the power to the jury. He was softer spoken than the first and very relaxed in his demeanor, much like he was trying to be relaxed about the verdict - because he was sure it was going his way.
It will be very interesting to watch these professional speakers in action next week.
